Contract: Cases and Materials, 14th edition, continues to be the leading casebook for students of contract law in Australia. Significant new cases extracted in this edition include: Pipikos v Trayans [2018] HCA 39 (the doctrine of part performance); Mann v Paterson Constructions Pty Ltd [2019] HCA 32 (total failure of consideration and the availability of restitution where a contract has been terminated for breach restitution); Ecosse Property Holdings Pty Ltd v Gee Dee Nominees Pty Ltd [2017] HCA 12; (2017) 261 CLR 544 (the purposive construction of contracts), along with short extracts from Cherry v Steele-Park [2017] NSWCA 295; (2017) 96 NSWLR 548 and Apple and Pear Australia Ltd v Pink Lady America LLC [2016] VSCA 280 (the availability of extrinsic evidence); short extracts from Marks and Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd [2015] UKSC 72; [2016] AC 742 (the requirements for implication of terms in fact) and Esso Australia Resources Pty Ltd v Southern Pacific Petroleum NL[2005] VSCA 228 (the implication of a duty to act in good faith); Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Chrisco Hampers Australia Ltd [2015] FCA 1204; (2015) 239 FCR 33 (unfair terms); short extracts from Lantry v Tomule Pty Ltd [2007] NSWSC 81 and Sharjade Pty Ltd v The Commonwealth of Australia [2009] NSWCA 373 (the circumstances in which a party in breach will be precluded from terminating a contract); Paciocco v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2016] HCA 28; (2016) 258 CLR 525 (penalties); a short extract from Simic v New South Wales Land and Housing Corporation [2016] HCA 47; (2016) 260 CLR 85 (rectification); Thorne v Kennedy [2017] HCA 49; (2017) 263 CLR 85 (undue influence and unconscionable dealing); and ASIC v Kobelt [2019] HCA 18 (statutory unconscionable conduct).
Contract: Cases & Materials 14th edition
Special offer terms
Zookal Study - 14-day Premium trial
Free trial
By clicking the checkbox "Add 14-day FREE trial" you are enrolling in a 2-week (14 day) free trial of Zookal Study Premium Plan, and if you do not cancel within those 14 days, you will be enrolled in an auto-renewing monthly subscription for Zookal Study Premium Plan at the end of the trial. Unused trial period benefits have no cash value, are not transferable, and expire at the end of the trial period.
Auto-Renewal
Following the expiration of any free trial period, your Zookal Study subscription will be renewed each month until you cancel. You consent to Zookal automatically charging your payment method on file $14.95 each month after any free trial period until you cancel.
How to Cancel
You can cancel your subscription anytime by visiting "My Account" on homework.zookal.com, clicking "Cancel" and completing the steps to cancel. Cancellations take effect at the end of the free trial period (if applicable) or at the end of the billing month in which your request to cancel was received. Subscription fees are not refundable.
Zookal Study Premium Monthly Subscription Includes:
Ability to post up to twenty (20) questions per month.
10% off your textbooks order and free standard shipping whenever you shop online at
textbooks.zookal.com.au
Unused monthly subscription benefits have no cash value, are not transferable, and expire at the end of each month. This means that subscription benefits do not roll over to or accumulate for use in subsequent months.
Payment Methods
Afterpay and Zip Pay will not be available for purchases with Zookal Study Premium Plan and/or Free Trial additions.
$1 preauthorisation
You may see a $1 preauthorisation by your bank which will disappear from your statement in a few business days..
Email communications
By adding Zookal Study Premium or Premium Free Trial, you agree to receive email communications from Zookal.
Contract: Cases and Materials, 14th edition, continues to be the leading casebook for students of contract law in Australia. Significant new cases extracted in this edition include: Pipikos v Trayans [2018] HCA 39 (the doctrine of part performance); Mann v Paterson Constructions Pty Ltd [2019] HCA 32 (total failure of consideration and the availability of restitution where a contract has been terminated for breach restitution); Ecosse Property Holdings Pty Ltd v Gee Dee Nominees Pty Ltd [2017] HCA 12; (2017) 261 CLR 544 (the purposive construction of contracts), along with short extracts from Cherry v Steele-Park [2017] NSWCA 295; (2017) 96 NSWLR 548 and Apple and Pear Australia Ltd v Pink Lady America LLC [2016] VSCA 280 (the availability of extrinsic evidence); short extracts from Marks and Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd [2015] UKSC 72; [2016] AC 742 (the requirements for implication of terms in fact) and Esso Australia Resources Pty Ltd v Southern Pacific Petroleum NL[2005] VSCA 228 (the implication of a duty to act in good faith); Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Chrisco Hampers Australia Ltd [2015] FCA 1204; (2015) 239 FCR 33 (unfair terms); short extracts from Lantry v Tomule Pty Ltd [2007] NSWSC 81 and Sharjade Pty Ltd v The Commonwealth of Australia [2009] NSWCA 373 (the circumstances in which a party in breach will be precluded from terminating a contract); Paciocco v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2016] HCA 28; (2016) 258 CLR 525 (penalties); a short extract from Simic v New South Wales Land and Housing Corporation [2016] HCA 47; (2016) 260 CLR 85 (rectification); Thorne v Kennedy [2017] HCA 49; (2017) 263 CLR 85 (undue influence and unconscionable dealing); and ASIC v Kobelt [2019] HCA 18 (statutory unconscionable conduct).
