Defending Humanity | Zookal Textbooks | Zookal Textbooks
  • Author(s) George P. Fletcher / Jens David Ohlin
  • SubtitleWhen Force is Justified and Why
  • Edition
  • Published13th October 2012
  • PublisherOxford University Press USA
  • ISBN9780199757213

When Force is Justified and Why

In Defending Humanity, internationally acclaimed legal scholar George P. Fletcher and Jens David Ohlin, a leading expert on international criminal law, tackle one of the most important and controversial questions of our time: When is war justified? When a nation is attacked, few would deny that it has the right to respond with force. But what about preemptive and preventive wars, or crossing another state's border to stop genocide? Was Israel justified in
initiating the Six Day War, and was NATO's intervention in Kosovo legal? What about the U.S. invasion of Iraq?In their provocative book, Fletcher and Ohlin offer a groundbreaking theory on
the legality of war with clear guidelines for evaluating these interventions. The authors argue that much of the confusion on the subject stems from a persistent misunderstanding of the United Nations Charter. The Charter appears to be very clear on the use of military force: it is only allowed when authorized by the Security Council or in self-defense. Unfortunately, this has led to the problem of justifying force when the Security Council refuses to act or when self-defense is thought not to
apply--and to the difficult dilemma of declaring such interventions illegal or ignoring the UN Charter altogether.Fletcher and Ohlin suggest that the answer lies in going back to
the domestic criminal law concepts upon which the UN Charter was originally based, in particular, the concept of "legitimate defense," which encompasses not only self-defense but defense of others. Lost in the English-language version of the Charter but a vital part of the French and other non-English versions, the concept of legitimate defense will enable political leaders, courts, and scholars to see the solid basis under international law for states to intervene with force--not just to
protect themselves against an imminent attack but also to defend other national groups.

Defending Humanity

Format
In stock at supplier

Leaves in 1-4 weeks

$42.46 $50.95 Save $8.49
or 4 payments of $10.61 with Zookal accepts Afterpay
Add Homework Help FREE trial and save a further 10% 

NEW PRICE

$38.21 + free shipping

(10% off - save $4.25)

Homework Help Free trial

14-day FREE trial. $14.95/mo after. Cancel anytime.

*Discount will apply at checkout.

 See terms and conditions

You will get a further 10% off for this item ($38.21 after discount) because you have added Homework Help Premium Free Trial to your bag.

For this discount to apply, you will need to complete checkout with the Homework Help Premium Free Trial in your bag.

-
+
  • Author(s) George P. Fletcher / Jens David Ohlin
  • SubtitleWhen Force is Justified and Why
  • Edition
  • Published13th October 2012
  • PublisherOxford University Press USA
  • ISBN9780199757213

When Force is Justified and Why

In Defending Humanity, internationally acclaimed legal scholar George P. Fletcher and Jens David Ohlin, a leading expert on international criminal law, tackle one of the most important and controversial questions of our time: When is war justified? When a nation is attacked, few would deny that it has the right to respond with force. But what about preemptive and preventive wars, or crossing another state's border to stop genocide? Was Israel justified in
initiating the Six Day War, and was NATO's intervention in Kosovo legal? What about the U.S. invasion of Iraq?In their provocative book, Fletcher and Ohlin offer a groundbreaking theory on
the legality of war with clear guidelines for evaluating these interventions. The authors argue that much of the confusion on the subject stems from a persistent misunderstanding of the United Nations Charter. The Charter appears to be very clear on the use of military force: it is only allowed when authorized by the Security Council or in self-defense. Unfortunately, this has led to the problem of justifying force when the Security Council refuses to act or when self-defense is thought not to
apply--and to the difficult dilemma of declaring such interventions illegal or ignoring the UN Charter altogether.Fletcher and Ohlin suggest that the answer lies in going back to
the domestic criminal law concepts upon which the UN Charter was originally based, in particular, the concept of "legitimate defense," which encompasses not only self-defense but defense of others. Lost in the English-language version of the Charter but a vital part of the French and other non-English versions, the concept of legitimate defense will enable political leaders, courts, and scholars to see the solid basis under international law for states to intervene with force--not just to
protect themselves against an imminent attack but also to defend other national groups.
translation missing: en.general.search.loading