Mary Leng offers a defense of mathematical fictionalism, according to which we have no reason to believe that there are any mathematical objects. Perhaps the most pressing challenge to mathematical fictionalism is the indispensability argument for the truth of our mathematical theories (and therefore for the existence of the mathematical objects posited by those theories). According to this argument, if we have reason to believe anything, we have reason
to believe that the claims of our best empirical theories are (at least approximately) true. But since claims whose truth would require the existence of mathematical objects are indispensable in formulating
our best empirical theories, it follows that we have good reason to believe in the mathematical objects posited by those mathematical theories used in empirical science, and therefore to believe that the mathematical theories utilized in empirical science are true. Previous responses to the indispensability argument have focussed on arguing that mathematical assumptions can be dispensed with in formulating our empirical theories. Leng, by contrast, offers an account of the role of mathematics
in empirical science according to which the successful use of mathematics in formulating our empirical theories need not rely on the truth of the mathematics utilized.
Mathematics and Reality
Special offer terms
Zookal Study - 14-day Premium trial
Free trial
By clicking the checkbox "Add 14-day FREE trial" you are enrolling in a 2-week (14 day) free trial of Zookal Study Premium Plan, and if you do not cancel within those 14 days, you will be enrolled in an auto-renewing monthly subscription for Zookal Study Premium Plan at the end of the trial. Unused trial period benefits have no cash value, are not transferable, and expire at the end of the trial period.
Auto-Renewal
Following the expiration of any free trial period, your Zookal Study subscription will be renewed each month until you cancel. You consent to Zookal automatically charging your payment method on file $14.95 each month after any free trial period until you cancel.
How to Cancel
You can cancel your subscription anytime by visiting "My Account" on homework.zookal.com, clicking "Cancel" and completing the steps to cancel. Cancellations take effect at the end of the free trial period (if applicable) or at the end of the billing month in which your request to cancel was received. Subscription fees are not refundable.
Zookal Study Premium Monthly Subscription Includes:
Ability to post up to twenty (20) questions per month.
10% off your textbooks order and free standard shipping whenever you shop online at
textbooks.zookal.com.au
Unused monthly subscription benefits have no cash value, are not transferable, and expire at the end of each month. This means that subscription benefits do not roll over to or accumulate for use in subsequent months.
Payment Methods
Afterpay and Zip Pay will not be available for purchases with Zookal Study Premium Plan and/or Free Trial additions.
$1 preauthorisation
You may see a $1 preauthorisation by your bank which will disappear from your statement in a few business days..
Email communications
By adding Zookal Study Premium or Premium Free Trial, you agree to receive email communications from Zookal.
Mary Leng offers a defense of mathematical fictionalism, according to which we have no reason to believe that there are any mathematical objects. Perhaps the most pressing challenge to mathematical fictionalism is the indispensability argument for the truth of our mathematical theories (and therefore for the existence of the mathematical objects posited by those theories). According to this argument, if we have reason to believe anything, we have reason
to believe that the claims of our best empirical theories are (at least approximately) true. But since claims whose truth would require the existence of mathematical objects are indispensable in formulating
our best empirical theories, it follows that we have good reason to believe in the mathematical objects posited by those mathematical theories used in empirical science, and therefore to believe that the mathematical theories utilized in empirical science are true. Previous responses to the indispensability argument have focussed on arguing that mathematical assumptions can be dispensed with in formulating our empirical theories. Leng, by contrast, offers an account of the role of mathematics
in empirical science according to which the successful use of mathematics in formulating our empirical theories need not rely on the truth of the mathematics utilized.